minco.me

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.

RFC: Mincome cryptocurrency experiment I'd like some feedback from the redditors on my latest thoughts on a new cryptocurrency, that I'm calling 'Mincome' (or for details, look at http://minco.me/RFC.html ) Some of the key points: There are at least 2 distinct cryptocurrencies I'm proposing. The first is 'mincome', for which the proof-of-work is live birth of a human, or at least some form of documentation/proof that uniquely identifies a currently alive human person. The second, which I'm calling ~~mincoin~~ humancoin (HMC) is likely going to be implemented with the latest Bitcoin, except with Freicoin's demurrage code, and Litecoin's Scrypt proof-of-work. Every 'mincome' address then gets part of the demurrage fees from HMC. (So basically every human who bothers to prove to the HMC network the Mincome proof-of-work, or having been born, gets an evenly distributed 'minimum income') And for the third key point (because Tesla liked 3, and so do I), I need some help figuring out how to integrate a distributed futures exchange into the core mincomed codebase. What this really all comes down to is I've got a farm in Iowa, and I want to be able to sell corn via a cryptocurrency, and the *coins available now are too volatile, or require I trust some people who like to play with money that run centralized exchanges. My dad once said "Never have a banker you can't punch in the face". He's got a point. The same goes with people who run exchanges... If I don't know where they live, then I do not trust them to run a credible exchange. I do however, trust that cryptographers, hackers, and bored college students will find all the holes in my mincome scheme before the bankers do. Tell me what's wrong. Let's fix it.