This cluster centers on 2764 connected domains tagged as BeaverTail, Kaiji, fbf543. 645 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1132 phone numbers (7638857447, 8664372914, 2157987305) with 10266 FTC complaints; 146 companies (JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., Advanced Resolution Services Inc., EVERBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8616274 CFPB complaints; 298 email addresses (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@vm...
security.stackexchange.com
First seen Feb 22, 2026
- No SSL certificate
- 57 community reports from users
Campaign Intelligence
This cluster centers on 3287 connected domains tagged as HijackLoader, RemcosRAT, screenconnect. 617 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1649 phone numbers (5408463620, 8552597377, 8007873903) with 7110 FTC complaints; 143 companies (Informative LLC, HomePlus Corporation, Doral Capital Corporation) with 8547081 CFPB complaints; 807 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@...
This cluster centers on 2874 connected domains tagged as QuasarRAT, StealitStealer, pw-k53mv9bc. 652 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1375 phone numbers (2157987305, 2025069230, 2028641298) with 14635 FTC complaints; 160 companies (JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., Advanced Resolution Services Inc., EVERBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8680419 CFPB complaints; 299 email addresses (abuse@fb.com, ...
This cluster centers on 1486 connected domains tagged as None, keylogger. 5 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1364 phone numbers (3124141737, 3163966869, 8553892999) with 17909 FTC complaints; 170 companies (EQUIFAX, INC., TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC., BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8747332 CFPB complaints; 187 email addresses (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@vmh5.grup...
Details
Related Domains
Community Reports
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Most Futureproof Email Provider So, I'm looking into finally getting unlazy about my data privacy and have been doing a bit of research about email providers. Protonmail and Tutanota seem to be universally acclaimed, and I'm happy to follow that advice. However, I do wonder about their staying power and I'd obviously like to pick the one that is least likely to go bust in the next 10-50 years. I have a number of different emails I use for different purposes, so I definitely want a multi-account package. Being a cheapass, I'm tempted to go with Tutanota (1.2€/month) over Proton (5€/month). But somehow Tutanota's being so cheap makes me wonder about its staying power. I also have the (obviously biased) intuition that a Swiss company (protonmail) is more future proof than a German company (Tutanota). Am I wrong. If so, why? Thanks in advance. EDIT: for anyone who's wondering, here's a bunch of good arguments agaist trying to host your own encrypted mail server: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/92985/why-do-security-experts-like-snowden-use-email-services-like-lavabit-and-hushmai
Share Your Experience
What's Your Exposure?
Know your risk exposure to this message with a Thorough Analysis. It returns a detailed report covering the complaint history, your data breach exposure, related scam entities, and risk signals tied to this email message. Check the box and enter your email address now.
Proton Pass — Unique passwords for every account
After a breach, reused passwords let attackers into your other accounts. Proton Pass generates and stores a unique password for each one.