Domain

www.bbc.co.uk

First seen Feb 23, 2026

Suspicious

No SSL certificate
29 community reports from users

Campaign Intelligence

Community members have submitted 3 distinct reports about www.bbc.co.uk between September 2012 and February 2016. Here is what people are reporting: "The unmentioned way to win UK elections There was a paper by one of the conservative think thanks published in the late 70s that showed that even given the same level of income and education and class voters were far more likely to vote to the right if: They owned and used a car rather than usin..." "Blagging: SE in the wild I'd never heard thi...

Part of: Community Reports: www.bbc.co.uk3/20/2026

This cluster centers on 2874 connected domains tagged as QuasarRAT, StealitStealer, pw-k53mv9bc. 652 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1375 phone numbers (2157987305, 2025069230, 2028641298) with 14635 FTC complaints; 160 companies (JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., Advanced Resolution Services Inc., EVERBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8680419 CFPB complaints; 299 email addresses (abuse@fb.com, ...

Part of: Other Robocall Campaign3/27/2026

Details

Registrar

British Broadcasting Corporation [Tag = BBC]

Registration Date

8/1/1996

First Seen

2/23/2026

Related Domains

No known connections to other entities yet.

Community Reports

The unmentioned way to win UK elections There was a paper by one of the conservative think thanks published in the late 70s that showed that even given the same level of income and education and class voters were far more likely to vote to the right if: They owned and used a car rather than using public transport. They owned shares rather than having a pension. They owned a house instead of renting. That is even middle-upper class voters were more likely to vote left instead of right if they used public transport, had a pension, and rented, and most importantly even working class voters would vote for the right if they owned a car, some shares, and a house, no matter how thin such ownership was. Just fancying themselves landlords with a sliver of equity in a modest 2-up-2-down made working class voters think that their interests were aligned with those of bosses and peers of the realm rather than the interests of other workers. I think that the original push to therefore undermine public transport, pensions, rented housing came from Keith Joseph, but it could have been Nigel Lawson who clinched the deal, or Norman Tebbit, or Malcolm Rifkind. Whoever was, that voting attitude study has become the right-wing bible in many countries, and in the UK Thatcher determinedly targeted enormous subsidies at car, share, and house ownership, while sabotaging public transport, the pensions system and the rented sector. The stroke of genius was of course Right-to-Buy and the legal prohibition to use for house building the meager proceeds from selling rented council housing at well below market prices to future gratefully Tory voters. Because of course pushing up house prices and pushing down wages may be break even for a voter - but what it does is mean they have a far greater % of income coming from property. People notice when being landlords nearly doubles their income. This was the goal of the *social engineering* policy, because it was a *social engineering* policy,

3691 days ago60 upvotes