This cluster centers on 2382 connected domains tagged as PureHVNC, elf, sh. 572 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 969 phone numbers (8772427372, 1319641540, 1319641221) with 557 FTC complaints; 690 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@aol.com, online.motors@consultant.com). Across all linked entities, consumers have filed 2228 complaints with federal agencies. Geog...
Domain
litecoinpool.org
First seen Feb 23, 2026
Suspicious
- No SSL certificate
- 28 community reports from users
Campaign Intelligence
This cluster centers on 2396 connected domains tagged as 156-233-71-230, Quakbot, lnk. 586 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 969 phone numbers (8772427372, 1319641540, 1319641221) with 565 FTC complaints; 690 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@aol.com, online.motors@consultant.com). Across all linked entities, consumers have filed 2237 complaints with federal agen...
This cluster centers on 1895 connected domains tagged as BeaverTail, RedLineStealer, password: 2026. 113 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 934 phone numbers (8772427372, 1319641540, 1319641221) with 524 FTC complaints; 683 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@aol.com, online.motors@consultant.com). Across all linked entities, consumers have filed 2093 complaints wit...
This cluster centers on 2416 connected domains tagged as BABADEDA, WallStealer, meterpreter. 607 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 969 phone numbers (5086371451, 9366439335, 1842506726) with 570 FTC complaints; 690 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@aol.com, online.motors@consultant.com). Across all linked entities, consumers have filed 2243 complaints with federa...
This cluster centers on 2764 connected domains tagged as BeaverTail, Kaiji, fbf543. 645 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1132 phone numbers (7638857447, 8664372914, 2157987305) with 10266 FTC complaints; 146 companies (JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., Advanced Resolution Services Inc., EVERBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8616274 CFPB complaints; 298 email addresses (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@vm...
This cluster centers on 3287 connected domains tagged as HijackLoader, RemcosRAT, screenconnect. 617 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1649 phone numbers (5408463620, 8552597377, 8007873903) with 7110 FTC complaints; 143 companies (Informative LLC, HomePlus Corporation, Doral Capital Corporation) with 8547081 CFPB complaints; 807 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@...
This cluster centers on 2874 connected domains tagged as QuasarRAT, StealitStealer, pw-k53mv9bc. 652 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1375 phone numbers (2157987305, 2025069230, 2028641298) with 14635 FTC complaints; 160 companies (JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., Advanced Resolution Services Inc., EVERBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8680419 CFPB complaints; 299 email addresses (abuse@fb.com, ...
Part of: Other Robocall Campaign3/27/2026
This cluster centers on 1486 connected domains tagged as None, keylogger. 5 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1364 phone numbers (3124141737, 3163966869, 8553892999) with 17909 FTC complaints; 170 companies (EQUIFAX, INC., TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC., BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8747332 CFPB complaints; 187 email addresses (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@vmh5.grup...
Details
Related Domains
domain
ltcexchange.bitparking.com
reported togetherdomaincryptocoincharts.com
reported togetherdomainblockchain.info
reported togetherdomainbtc-e.com
reported togetherdomainbtccharts.com
reported togetherdomainvircurex.com
reported togetherdomainbitcoin.sipa.be
reported togetherdomainexplorer.litecoin.net
reported togethercompanyBlock, Inc.
reported togethercompanyThe Money Company
reported togethercompanyCoinbase, Inc.
reported togetherCommunity Reports
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Estimated costs to attack various coins Why you would attack a blockchain is beyond me, but assuming someone wanted to then this is an estimate of what it might cost. The bitcoin network hash rate (for June 16 2013) seems to be 150,000 GH/s according to bitcoin.sipa.be. The retail price for a 500 GH/s ASIC is about $22,500 at butterfly labs. If my math is right then this means it would cost a bit less than $7,000,000 retail to achieve the same hash rate as the bitcoin network (and perform a theoretical 51% attack on a blockchain with a billion dollar market cap). The litecoin network has had a minimum hash rate of about 15 GH/s recently, according to litecoinpool.org. This is about 15,000,000 kH/s. A 7950 GPU can give you about 600 kH/s if maxed out and they cost about $300 each. Therefore if you ignore the cost of motherboards, PSUs, RAM etc it would cost about $7,5000,000 to equal to litecoin hash rate and perform a 51% attack. More when you add in the mobos, PSUs etc. This is for a blockchain that has a market cap of about $40,000,000. Feathercoin had a hash rate of about 180,000 kH/s just before it got attacked. It would have cost about $90,000 just for the GPUs to mount an attack on feathercoin when the mining strength was so low (more when you factor in motherboards etc of course). This is for a blockchain with a market cap of about $800,000. Market cap source used was coinmarketcap.com
4667 days ago7 upvotes
Share Your Experience
What's Your Exposure?
Know your risk exposure to this message with a Thorough Analysis. It returns a detailed report covering the complaint history, your data breach exposure, related scam entities, and risk signals tied to this email message. Check the box and enter your email address now.
Proton Pass — Unique passwords for every account
After a breach, reused passwords let attackers into your other accounts. Proton Pass generates and stores a unique password for each one.
Try Proton Pass freeAffiliate link. We may earn a commission.