This cluster centers on 2382 connected domains tagged as PureHVNC, elf, sh. 572 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 969 phone numbers (8772427372, 1319641540, 1319641221) with 557 FTC complaints; 690 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@aol.com, online.motors@consultant.com). Across all linked entities, consumers have filed 2228 complaints with federal agencies. Geog...
tutanota.com
First seen Feb 22, 2026
- No SSL certificate
- 70 community reports from users
Campaign Intelligence
This cluster centers on 2396 connected domains tagged as 156-233-71-230, Quakbot, lnk. 586 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 969 phone numbers (8772427372, 1319641540, 1319641221) with 565 FTC complaints; 690 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@aol.com, online.motors@consultant.com). Across all linked entities, consumers have filed 2237 complaints with federal agen...
This cluster centers on 1895 connected domains tagged as BeaverTail, RedLineStealer, password: 2026. 113 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 934 phone numbers (8772427372, 1319641540, 1319641221) with 524 FTC complaints; 683 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@aol.com, online.motors@consultant.com). Across all linked entities, consumers have filed 2093 complaints wit...
This cluster centers on 2416 connected domains tagged as BABADEDA, WallStealer, meterpreter. 607 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 969 phone numbers (5086371451, 9366439335, 1842506726) with 570 FTC complaints; 690 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@aol.com, online.motors@consultant.com). Across all linked entities, consumers have filed 2243 complaints with federa...
This cluster centers on 1 connected domains identified through shared infrastructure and registration patterns. Do not click links to any of the flagged domains. If you have visited one, check your accounts for unauthorized activity and consider changing your passwords. You can report suspicious contacts to the FTC at reportfraud.ftc.gov or to the FCC at consumercomplaints.fcc.gov. This campaign was identified through automated analysis of threat intelligence feeds and entity relationship mapp...
This cluster centers on 2764 connected domains tagged as BeaverTail, Kaiji, fbf543. 645 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1132 phone numbers (7638857447, 8664372914, 2157987305) with 10266 FTC complaints; 146 companies (JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., Advanced Resolution Services Inc., EVERBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8616274 CFPB complaints; 298 email addresses (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@vm...
This cluster centers on 3287 connected domains tagged as HijackLoader, RemcosRAT, screenconnect. 617 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1649 phone numbers (5408463620, 8552597377, 8007873903) with 7110 FTC complaints; 143 companies (Informative LLC, HomePlus Corporation, Doral Capital Corporation) with 8547081 CFPB complaints; 807 email addresses (kellymoore_64@yahoo.com, schantzsybg7@...
This cluster centers on 2874 connected domains tagged as QuasarRAT, StealitStealer, pw-k53mv9bc. 652 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1375 phone numbers (2157987305, 2025069230, 2028641298) with 14635 FTC complaints; 160 companies (JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., Advanced Resolution Services Inc., EVERBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8680419 CFPB complaints; 299 email addresses (abuse@fb.com, ...
This cluster centers on 1486 connected domains tagged as None, keylogger. 5 of these domains have been flagged by threat intelligence feeds including Google Safe Browsing and URLhaus. The connected infrastructure includes 1364 phone numbers (3124141737, 3163966869, 8553892999) with 17909 FTC complaints; 170 companies (EQUIFAX, INC., TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS, INC., BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION) with 8747332 CFPB complaints; 187 email addresses (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@vmh5.grup...
Details
Related Domains
mail.tutanota.de
reported togetherdomainwww.barracudanetworks.com
reported togetherdomainb.barracudacentral.org
reported togetherdomainwww.barracudacentral.org
reported togetheremailswissbrothers1@tutanota.com
reported togetherdomainfedora.com
reported togethercompanyTITLE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
reported togethercompanyACCESS GROUP INC.
reported togethercompanyCredit Corp Solutions Inc.
reported togetherCommunity Reports
tutanota.com (tuta.com) security and privacy is a scum. Don't consider this service if you need an email Hi there! I read an investigation on Bellingcat (an investigative journalism group) about a week ago about a topic that I had been participating in for some time. I decided to contact those journalists to provide them a bit more context but I decided to avoid contacting them from my main accounts straightforwardly. I did some research about what email services are considered as secure and talked to my friend who has used [tuta.com](http://tuta.com) for quite some time as his main email. I decided to try [tuta.com](http://tuta.com) to contact Bellingcat and take a closer look at this service since I'm not too excited with Google and thinking about moving to something else. So about a week ago I created an account on [tuta.com](http://tuta.com) and sent an email to Bellingcat and was checking email once a day. After 2-3 days I started to get the "**Invalid login credentials. Please try again**" error on login with no good reason. I contacted their support (you have to contact it from any other email which is funny for email service by itself). There was no response from their support for 3 days. Today they sent me this message: **It looks like your account was deactivated by our system because the registered pattern was not approved. Unfortunately we cannot make an exception in this case.** There were no warnings, I was waiting for an important email and would never receive it or maybe I received it but I will never be able to read it. >I don't know based on what pattern they deactivated the account. They might have read my email (there was nothing illegal), they could store and analyse my data and that is what they call "privacy" on their promos. While I was waiting for the response I read some reviews where people complained that other email services often mark tuta as spam, they do not have proper responsive support, they clean and block any bad revie
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
I've asked question about Tuta API support and now it keeps banning all my questions I've foolishly posted the message below on r/tutanota without paying attention to their rules. The AutoModerator now keeps rejecting all my posts telling me "links are not allowed", even if I don't include any link in the post message. The funny, or rather sad, thing is that the links are to their web, they are essential to the meaning of my message. I didn't intend to be mean, just asking genuinely for the API support. Overall, I'm very interested in their product, but unless they show a change of attitude towards owning the data, I can't move there. Could someone re-post it on their sub reddit? Of course with links redacted. I'm still curious what's their answer. The message: =========== Hey u/Tutanota I'm disappointed with the lack of integration with unsecure clients/backups. You state here \`tutanota.com/support/#integration\` that it's fine to use your API to build you own clients. Well, I can understand that you don't have resources to keep up with proper documentation, but could you guarantee API compatibility? Could you publish at least when an API version became obsolete and promise support for retired API for a few months? Snice using your API would require "reverse engineering" I'd say 6 months is needed at a minimum. Thank you for replying on my other post, however I'm really not satisfied with a manual click-through solution to backup my emails locally \`tutanota.com/support/#import\` My computer is my kingdom, I fully trust it and want all my data unencrypted, fully manageable, etc. on my pc. I've just highlighted the key parts to make you understand that I'd love to pay you for excellent online services but I won't ever sell you my data so please don't deliberately prevent me from having it. Your answers around were very arrogant so far, you know better than the customers what they need. Did that attitude change or still hold true?
Share Your Experience
What's Your Exposure?
Know your risk exposure to this message with a Thorough Analysis. It returns a detailed report covering the complaint history, your data breach exposure, related scam entities, and risk signals tied to this email message. Check the box and enter your email address now.
Proton Pass — Unique passwords for every account
After a breach, reused passwords let attackers into your other accounts. Proton Pass generates and stores a unique password for each one.