Scam Campaign Report: Multi-Vector Financial and Malware Threat Cluster Consumer Protection Intelligence Report This report documents a cluster of 5,789 connected entities involved in a broad, multi-vector fraud and malware campaign targeting consumers across the United States and internationally. The cluster includes 1,271 phone numbers, 2,957 domains, 143 companies, and 281 email addresses, interconnected through 17 confirmed cross-entity relationships. The campaign appears to operate across ...
prodmarc.com
First seen Feb 22, 2026
- No SSL certificate
- 2 community reports from users
Campaign Intelligence
Scam Campaign Report: Multi-Vector Financial Fraud and Malware Infrastructure Cluster This report documents a cluster of 4,628 connected entities identified through cross-referencing complaint databases, threat intelligence feeds, and community reporting. The cluster spans 1,295 phone numbers, 2,559 domains and IP addresses, 160 companies, and 252 email addresses. While the individual phone numbers in this cluster each carry zero FTC complaints at this time, the broader infrastructure surroundi...
Scam Campaign Intelligence Report: Multi-Vector Financial and Malware Threat Cluster This report covers a cluster of 4,263 connected entities identified through aggregated complaint data, infrastructure analysis, and community reporting. The cluster encompasses 1,055 phone numbers, 2,451 domains and IP addresses, 146 companies, and 252 email addresses, forming one of the more complex mixed-threat groupings analyzed for consumer protection purposes. The campaign appears to exploit consumer famil...
Scam Campaign Report: Multi-Vector Financial Fraud and Infrastructure Cluster This report covers a cluster of 3,157 connected entities identified through shared reporting, co-appearance in consumer complaints, and cross-domain infrastructure linkages. The campaign spans 1,314 phone numbers, 1,486 domains, 170 companies, and 187 email addresses, with 16 documented cross-entity relationships. The cluster appears to blend legitimate financial institution impersonation with fraudulent domains, susp...
Scam Campaign Report: Multi-Vector Fraud and Malware Cluster (3,955 Connected Entities) This report documents a large and technically sophisticated scam campaign comprising 3,955 connected entities, including 651 phone numbers, 2,107 flagged domains and IP addresses, and 182 associated email addresses. The campaign spans multiple fraud categories, combining impersonation-based telephone scams, malware distribution infrastructure, phishing email operations, and consumer fraud documented across c...
Scam Campaign Analysis Report: Multi-Vector Fraud and Malware Cluster (3,969 Connected Entities) Investigators have identified a sprawling cluster of 3,969 connected entities operating across phone, email, and web-based infrastructure, comprising 651 phone numbers, 2,121 domains and IP addresses, and 182 email addresses. The campaign spans multiple fraud categories including impersonation calls, malware distribution, botnet operations, and overpayment scams. The most prominently documented phon...
Scam Campaign Report: Multi-Vector Fraud Network Involving Impersonation Calls, Malware Infrastructure, and Online Vehicle Purchase Fraud This report covers a cluster of 3,426 connected entities, including 619 phone numbers, 1,630 domains, and 181 email addresses, tied to a broad and technically sophisticated fraud campaign. The campaign combines government and business impersonation robocalls, malware distribution infrastructure, and consumer-facing vehicle purchase scams. The scale and divers...
Scam Campaign Report: Multi-Vector Fraud and Malware Network (Cluster of 3,989 Connected Entities) This report documents a large-scale fraud and malware campaign identified through a cluster of 3,989 connected entities, including 651 phone numbers, 2,141 domains and IP addresses, and 182 email addresses. The campaign operates across multiple attack surfaces simultaneously, combining impersonation phone calls, malware-laced infrastructure, and deceptive email outreach to target consumers across ...
Details
Related Domains
info@progist.net
reported togetherdomainprogist.net
reported togethercompanyACCESS GROUP INC.
reported togethercompanyDirect, Inc
reported togethercompanyACCOUNT SERVICES INC.
reported togetherphone8773824357
campaign co-memberphone8772427372
campaign co-memberphone3054749429
campaign co-memberphone9056283715
campaign co-memberphone2062221648
campaign co-memberphone8777058586
campaign co-memberphone5086371451
campaign co-memberphone2019841313
campaign co-memberphone4063591564
campaign co-memberphone2012011305
campaign co-memberphone3074282900
campaign co-memberphone3074011011
campaign co-memberphone3103658295
campaign co-memberphone8002305725
campaign co-memberphone3096844401
campaign co-memberphone8887729116
campaign co-memberphone9092565500
campaign co-memberphone9092565556
campaign co-memberphone8886016865
campaign co-memberCommunity Reports
How to improve organization's phishing simulation programme ​ [How to improve organization's phishing simulation programme](https://preview.redd.it/eufzlntwo0851.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bf83c00f7354f8ae8a8fa7ad1c4664918b61090b) A lot of progressive organizations have been running phishing simulation programmes for their employees for many years now. These programmes are executed either with consultation of a cyber security company as a service or through a phishing simulation platform or as a hybrid model. The key objective of these programmes has been to train the end employees to detect and report most commonly known phishing incidents. However, these programmes have been highly ineffective to identify topical phishing attacks resulting in a material impact on the organization. The reason being, some of the most high profile and successful phishing attacks were wrapped in the context of a usual business process of a critical user. These phishing attacks can be highly covert, if they are further wrapped in the context of a current topical matter, for instance COVID-19. Definition of a critical user need not always be a system administrator or payment processing employee; it could be a PR / marketing department employee dealing with massive listing of customer leads generated or it could be a customer helpline executive possessing a list of high profile irate and vulnerable customers. In this article, I am trying to bring about a change in mindset of how phishing simulation programmes should be conceptualized and executed. ​ https://preview.redd.it/58shpo62p0851.png?width=1267&format=png&auto=webp&s=d9000c1646673a3d695f6fbdaa2da65d3493bcf4 **To start with, let us understand the present threat landscape …** Since mid-March, cyber-criminals launched a variety of COVID-19 themed phishing and malware attacks against essential workers, healthcare facilities, and also the recently unemployed. One of the vital reasons behind the succes
How to improve organization's phishing simulation programme ​ [How to improve organization's phishing simulation programme](https://preview.redd.it/eufzlntwo0851.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bf83c00f7354f8ae8a8fa7ad1c4664918b61090b) A lot of progressive organizations have been running phishing simulation programmes for their employees for many years now. These programmes are executed either with consultation of a cyber security company as a service or through a phishing simulation platform or as a hybrid model. The key objective of these programmes has been to train the end employees to detect and report most commonly known phishing incidents. However, these programmes have been highly ineffective to identify topical phishing attacks resulting in a material impact on the organization. The reason being, some of the most high profile and successful phishing attacks were wrapped in the context of a usual business process of a critical user. These phishing attacks can be highly covert, if they are further wrapped in the context of a current topical matter, for instance COVID-19. Definition of a critical user need not always be a system administrator or payment processing employee; it could be a PR / marketing department employee dealing with massive listing of customer leads generated or it could be a customer helpline executive possessing a list of high profile irate and vulnerable customers. In this article, I am trying to bring about a change in mindset of how phishing simulation programmes should be conceptualized and executed. ​ https://preview.redd.it/58shpo62p0851.png?width=1267&format=png&auto=webp&s=d9000c1646673a3d695f6fbdaa2da65d3493bcf4 **To start with, let us understand the present threat landscape …** Since mid-March, cyber-criminals launched a variety of COVID-19 themed phishing and malware attacks against essential workers, healthcare facilities, and also the recently unemployed. One of the vital reasons behind the succes
Share Your Experience
What's Your Exposure?
Know your risk exposure to this message with a Thorough Analysis. It returns a detailed report covering the complaint history, your data breach exposure, related scam entities, and risk signals tied to this email message. Check the box and enter your email address now.